首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   342篇
  免费   34篇
  国内免费   29篇
教育   120篇
科学研究   112篇
体育   6篇
综合类   5篇
信息传播   162篇
  2023年   7篇
  2022年   20篇
  2021年   25篇
  2020年   17篇
  2019年   24篇
  2018年   27篇
  2017年   19篇
  2016年   18篇
  2015年   22篇
  2014年   34篇
  2013年   43篇
  2012年   39篇
  2011年   26篇
  2010年   25篇
  2009年   14篇
  2008年   8篇
  2007年   11篇
  2006年   2篇
  2005年   2篇
  2004年   3篇
  2003年   7篇
  2002年   1篇
  2001年   3篇
  2000年   4篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   2篇
  1996年   1篇
排序方式: 共有405条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
IntroductionWhile early commenting on studies is seen as one of the advantages of preprints, the type of such comments, and the people who post them, have not been systematically explored.Materials and methodsWe analysed comments posted between 21 May 2015 and 9 September 2019 for 1983 bioRxiv preprints that received only one comment on the bioRxiv website. The comment types were classified by three coders independently, with all differences resolved by consensus.ResultsOur analysis showed that 69% of comments were posted by non-authors (N = 1366), and 31% by the preprints’ authors themselves (N = 617). Twelve percent of non-author comments (N = 168) were full review reports traditionally found during journal review, while the rest most commonly contained praises (N = 577, 42%), suggestions (N = 399, 29%), or criticisms (N = 226, 17%). Authors’ comments most commonly contained publication status updates (N = 354, 57%), additional study information (N = 158, 26%), or solicited feedback for the preprints (N = 65, 11%).ConclusionsOur results indicate that comments posted for bioRxiv preprints may have potential benefits for both the public and the scholarly community. Further research is needed to measure the direct impact of these comments on comments made by journal peer reviewers, subsequent preprint versions or journal publications.  相似文献   
2.
邢爱敏 《编辑学报》2020,32(5):586-590
当前学术生态现状堪忧,由此引起了大众对科技期刊学术质量、学术操守的普遍质疑。而科技期刊编辑在学术传播中的主体性质决定了其在学术生态圈构建中具有不可推卸的责任。同时,基于严谨的治学态度、慧眼识珠的才能、良好的沟通交流能力以及资源意识的自我培养,科技期刊编辑在构建学术生态圈方面的潜能也被充分激发,“问题前置化”策略防范学术不端、保持终身学习态度以提高自身学术素养、组建优质专家库以打造学术共同体这3项措施则体现了科技期刊编辑在构建学术生态圈中的担当和作为。  相似文献   
3.
【目的】通过分析研究生学术论文中多发的学术不端现象,探究此种现象对学术环境、学术生态和学术出版的侵蚀和伤害。【方法】 概括分析了研究生学术论文中存在的学术不端行为的表现形式、表现特征及成因。【结果】 提出基于学术共同体的视域,从制度、规范、技术层面构建研究生学术不端行为的防范体系。【结论】 科技期刊应发挥学术共同体的作用,营造良好的学术出版环境,促进期刊的创新和发展。  相似文献   
4.
This article focuses on moral authorship as an element of the professional development of novice teachers in the Netherlands. Moral authorship refers to the ability of teachers to observe, identify, verbalize and reflect on the moral aspects of their work in a proactive and dialogical manner. We elaborate on moral authorship by theoretically exploring six interdependent tasks of moral meaning making: moral commitment, awareness, orientation and positioning, moral performance and evaluation. Narratives of 19 novice teachers were analyzed to explore moral authorship in teachers’ talk. The results show the opportunities of moral authorship to support, navigate, and reinforce the professional development of novice teachers. This study suggests professional self-dialogs for enhancing the development of moral authorship.  相似文献   
5.
随着我国知识产权方面的法律法规的逐步完善,全社会的著作权法律意识日益提高。因此,学术期刊社要努力把版权保护工作提高到一个新水平;论文的网络出版权问题、未发表论文的侵权问题、处理好署名权问题、修改权问题、“抄袭行为”与“文责自负”等问题。期刊编辑既要有责任维护期刊权益,更有责任维护作者权利。  相似文献   
6.
This study analyzed articles published in four school psychology journals (Journal of School Psychology, Psychology in the Schools, School Psychology Quarterly, and School Psychology Review) between the years 2009 and 2015. Articles were classified based on whether they were narrative or empirical, and affiliation of each author was classified as either practitioner or university. Results were compared to those of a previous study that similarly classified articles from 2000 to 2008. Across the years, the total number of authors increased; however, the proportion of practitioners compared to university affiliates decreased from 9% to 6%. In particular, a regression analysis revealed a large increase in the number of university secondary authors. Discussion focuses on examining the impact that practitioners’ involvement in research has on implementing evidence‐based practices within the schools.  相似文献   
7.
学术不端文献检测系统资源丰富,技术先进,具有检测、对比分析、管理和自动生成等功能;系统在学术期刊编辑实践中具有预防和打击学术不端行为、提高编辑的工作效率,以及提高学术期刊的学术影响力等重要作用。  相似文献   
8.
This editorial examines the question of whether plagiarism may be on the increase in the social sciences and, if so, what needs to be done to keep the problem in check. It was prompted by the discovery of an alert reader in June 2007 that a 1993 paper in Research Policy appeared to have plagiarised a 1980 article in the Journal of Business. The allegation was investigated, and it was agreed by the Editors that the 1993 paper constituted a clear and serious case of plagiarism. However, the author concerned has published over 100 articles and books. Already, two other publications have been judged by the editors of the journals concerned to have plagiarised previous publications. Two more are under investigation, but the great majority of the remainder still remain to be checked. The fact that academic misconduct on this scale has gone unchecked over such a prolonged period raises serious issues about the efficacy of the processes used to police the conduct of researchers. Furthermore, the unexpected discovery that a paper by the author under investigation appears itself to have been plagiarised poses a fundamental question as to whether plagiarism may be far more common than previously assumed. The editorial concludes that a measured degree of vigilance and a greater willingness to pursue any well-founded suspicions of research misconduct are required by editors, referees, publishers and the wider academic community if the scourge of plagiarism is to be kept at bay.  相似文献   
9.
学术不端行为的模型化研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
在对学术不端行为作出基本界定后,运用社会学视角的越轨理论模型和哲学视角的竞争模型建构出两种认识论,前者偏重社会控制,后者则强调文化控制。两种模型的对比研究有助于加深对学术不端行为的理解,同时也为寻找可能的解决方法提供有益的启示。  相似文献   
10.
近年来学术界频繁出现学术不端问题,其中学术期刊是学术失信的高发领域,作者缺乏诚信固然是产生学术不端的种子,作为学术期刊诚信的建设者和参与者的编辑也同样负有重要责任。为净化学术环境,本文从分析稿件处理过程中学术期刊编辑可能出现的学术不端行为入手,提出加强编辑道德教育、签订诚信责任书、规范审稿流程、加强对学术不端的抽查和审查、建立编辑成长的良好机制等净化学术期刊编辑行为的措施,系统地防范可能出现的编辑学术不端行为,使得学术期刊编辑成为真正的科学“守门人”。  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号